|
Post by Den makes music on Apr 27, 2021 18:31:38 GMT
Hi all,
I have Messiah 64bits and ME80 64bits but also purchased recently u-he Repro and honestly I got the woah effect : it sounds damned good and better than Messiah. I'm wondering why Messiah cannot sound as "analog". But my main interest now is for ME80. Is it possible to achieve a quality gap (anti-alias etc, I don't really know) with an increase of CPU use of course but to get a warmer, more analog sound ? If the solution is to rewrite all the code (if a circuit simulation is needed for example), I guess it's impossible. Just a thought...
|
|
|
Post by popeye on Sept 14, 2021 21:22:45 GMT
Hi all, I have Messiah 64bits and ME80 64bits but also purchased recently u-he Repro and honestly I got the woah effect : it sounds damned good and better than Messiah. I'm wondering why Messiah cannot sound as "analog". But my main interest now is for ME80. Is it possible to achieve a quality gap (anti-alias etc, I don't really know) with an increase of CPU use of course but to get a warmer, more analog sound ? If the solution is to rewrite all the code (if a circuit simulation is needed for example), I guess it's impossible. Just a thought... Hi Den, You should enjoy the upgrade to the latest version of Messiah. Both are synthesizers more than worthy of remaining in your collection.
The ME80 update is fine too.
|
|